The current king and his shooter are way more dangerous than Ralph and Ed. They are more like the American version of Saddam and his publicity guy whatever his name was. The one who kept having news conferences saying the Iraq army was repelling the invaders.
But what the heck are we going to do? We have the old guy who wants a hundred year war, the black activist who associates with anti-American ministers, and poor Hill who seems the least dangerous of the group. If the pollsters gave a choice of "None of the Above" it would get 75% of the vote.
I guess Ralph Nader is a safe choice not to start a war or do anything else for that matter. Hell-in-a-handbasket comes to mind.
Is this off topic?
|