Quote:
Originally Posted by King_of_orchid_growing:)
Maybe I spelled it wrong or something. There is a natural cross with Phal venosa in it. I don't recall if it was Phal amboinensis or another one of its close relatives.
Oak Hill Gardens had some for sale a long while ago.
|
It might be spelled right. Neither Kew or the RHS has a record of any natural hybrid involving venosa, so it may just be a recently discovered hybrid. Phal venosa itself was not discovered until 1983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Call_Me_Bob
i think everyone has answered the original question very well (asside from random unprovoked attacks...)
phillip, i have a question about the natural hybrids! is it
A) Phalaenopsis Xleucorrhoda
B) Phalaenopsis X leucorrhoda
OR
C) Phalaenopsis Xleucorrhoda
?
|
it's traditionally a multiplication sign, not the letter x:
Phalaenopsis ×
leucorrhoda
if you can't type the multiplication sign, or you're worried that it might not show up properly on other peoples computers, type the letter x with a space after it:
Phalaenopsis x
leucorrhoda
for naturally occuring plants, the rules are defined in the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants
for man-made hybrids and named clones, the rules are defined in the International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants