Look what i found.
Login
User Name
Password   


Registration is FREE. Click to become a member of OrchidBoard community
(You're NOT logged in)

menu menu

Sponsor
Donate Now
and become
Forum Supporter.

Look what i found.
Many perks!
<...more...>


Sponsor
 

Google


Fauna Top Sites
LOG IN/REGISTER TO CLOSE THIS ADVERTISEMENT
  #1  
Old 12-29-2008, 07:38 PM
rogerman rogerman is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Nonthaburi Thailand
Posts: 465
Look what i found. Male
Thumbs up Look what i found.

I found an interesting article on the net. Comment on it and pick it to bits. We can never get enough information on helping our investments.
Have fun reading

ORCHID MUSINGS

by Jerry Sellers

Although it is common practice to call them Orchid food, fertilizers are not really food for our Orchids. Using water, carbon dioxide and energy from the sun, Orchids actually make their own food. So fertilizers can best be called Orchid nutrients. Plant nutritionists have identified seventeen (17) elements essential to Orchid growth. Because Orchids require them in larger quantities for maximum growth, Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P) and Potassium (K) are referred to as macro nutrients. The other elements needed in smaller quantities, such as Calcium (Ca), Iron (Fe), Copper (Cu), and Zinc (Z), are referred to as micro nutrients or trace elements.

All commercial Orchid fertilizers are labeled with three numbers, such as 10-20-30. These three numbers are the percentage by weight of the primary nutrient components of Nitrogen (N), Phosphorous or phosphates (P) and Potassium or potash (K) in the fertilizer.

Nitrogen is important for leaf and stem growth and provides the rich green color in leaves.

Phosphorous provides for root and flower development.

Potassium helps build Orchid tissue and aids in the production of vital chlorophyll.

A fertilizer is said to be complete when it contains N, P, and K. Fertilizers are said to be balanced when they have the same ratio of N, P, and K. Examples of commonly used Orchid fertilizers ratios are 20-20-20, 30-10-10, and 10-10-10. When comparing fertilizers, one is told to check the ratio of the three numbers to each other. How many times have you heard "20-20-20 is exactly the same as 10-10-10, just use less of it"?. True, each has a ratio of 1 to 1 to 1; However, they are exactly the same in ratio only! As these ratio numbers are percentage expressions of the primary nutrient components, a hobbyist should compute the amount of each fertilizer needed to obtain the ideal concentration of the nutrient. For periodic feedings,150 to 200 parts per million (PPM) of N is excellent. To obtain the desired concentration of Nitrogen, One could use a chart. But the actual calculations are quite easy. The same calculation can be used for obtaining the desired concentration of the other nutrient components. Using the given rule that one ounce of fertilizer dissolved in 100 gallons of water yields 75 (PPM) of fertilizer at delivery. Therefore, to decide how many ounces of 10-10-10 to add to 100 gallons of water to obtain 200 PPM available Nitrogen at delivery, multiply the decimal equivalent of the 10% N component in the formula, 0.10 x 75 PPM = 7.5 PPM; then 200 PPM divided by 7.5 PPM means that 26.7 ounces of the formula would be needed. For the 20-20-20 product, the calculation would be .20 x 75PPM=15 PPM; then 200PPM/15PPM =13.3 ounces. Of course if you use a five gallon bucket of water instead of a 100 gallon bucket, divide the required product by 20 ( 5 gallons is 1/20 of 100), ie 13.3/20 = .665 ounces, or by 100 if you are using a one gallon bucket, which would be 13.3/100=0.133 ounces. If you use a siphoning system, such as 15:1 or 16:1, simply adjust the amount of the fertilizer to 3/4 of the amount calculated for 100 gallons for the concentrate. The concentrate is mixed 1 part concentrate to 15 or 16 parts water, resulting in 75 to 80 gallons of mixed nutrient water at delivery.

So, the actual amounts needed are different depending on which formulation is used. The old "one tablespoon per gallon" recommendation is not really usuable. Now that you have figured out the proper concentration, you need to check the analysis data on the fertilizer container to determine the true available N at delivery. Review the data information, discounting any part of the nitrogen availability that comes from urea. It can take up to a year break down Urea . By that time, the Urea is well out of your potting media, and totally unavailable to your Orchids.. So if urea constitutes 10% of the Nitrogen source in the 20%-20%-20% formula, then 50% of the Nitrogen is unavailable to the plant ( 10/20=50%), so you need to double the amount of fertilizer to get the proper amount of fertilizer to your plant. Which means doubling all the other components. Now we are entering into an area for another article called "nutrient antagonism's". Wherein the excess of one nutrient reduces the uptake of another. As an example too high concentration of Nitrogen has been proven to inhibit an Orchid's ability to absorb and use Potassium (K). The lack of K can be seen in leggy, weak stemmed plants, which lack the strength to hold up their leaves. The easiest way around this dilemma is to use Non urea fertilizers. These Non Urea based fertilizers provide 100% immediately available nitrogen, which the urea based fertilizers do not. We recommend and use Grow More fertilizers.

While looking at the data information on the fertilizer container, look for the micronutrient components. Many of the current Orchid fertilizers do not have any micro nutrients in their formula. The lack of micro nutrients is not a problem for the terrestrial plants, as the micro nutrients can be obtained from the soil. In soilless conditions, in which most Orchids are grown, micronutrient deficiencies can and do become a problem. Again, We recommend and use Grow More fertilizers , which incorporate the vital micro nutrients into their formula. The micro nutrients provide strength for the new growth and support for the flowers

The fertilizer formula should match the potting medium. Use 20-10-20 with coconut chips, tree fern, charcoal, or various inorganic aggregates, but use 30-10-10 (urea based), or 20-10-20 (non urea) with fir bark. For bloom boosting, use 6-30-30 for better blooming. This formula adds more K to provide plant strength to hold up the additional flowers. Many formulae do not provide the needed strength nutrients. You get a better blooming, but the flowers droop.

Slow release fertilizers release nutrients (make them available to the Orchid) over an extended period. Cottonseed meal, blood meal bone meal and fish emulsion are examples of organic fertilizers. These contain relatively low concentrations of actual nutrients and must be used in larger quantities. Most Orchid media can not readily accommodate Slow release fertilizers, because the granules are washed through the potting media before being completely dissolved. They do find some use in fine medias, which prevent the washing through problem.

Remember well, fertilizers are chemical salts, much like the familiar table salt. As a chemical salt, fertilizers will absorb water from their surroundings. Just leave a fertilizer container open for a few days to see this statement in action. So if tender Orchid roots grow close to the fertilizer granules or fertilizer residue, water will be drawn from the roots. The cells in the roots will begin to dehydrate or "bum." Frequent clear water rinses will keep the residue to a minimum. If the clear water rinses, do not wash away the residue, then re potting is in order.
The best rule of thumb is to under fertilize, rather than over fertilize. Orchids in the wild do not get all that much to "eat", and they survive well.

Last edited by rogerman; 12-29-2008 at 10:07 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-29-2008, 07:48 PM
dounoharm dounoharm is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Nov 2008
Zone: 9b
Location: north florida
Posts: 3,384
Default

very good information...i dont know about the recommended fertilizer 'grow more'...never heard of it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-29-2008, 07:57 PM
Ray's Avatar
Ray Ray is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: May 2005
Member of:AOS
Location: Oak Island NC
Posts: 15,065
Look what i found. Male
Default

Not a lot new there, and unfortunately, the article perpetuates the myth of a bloom booster.
__________________
Ray Barkalow, Orchid Iconoclast
FIRSTRAYS.COM
Try Kelpak - you won't be sorry!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-29-2008, 08:17 PM
flhiker flhiker is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Feb 2007
Zone: 10b
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,667
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray View Post
Not a lot new there, and unfortunately, the article perpetuates the myth of a bloom booster.
Ray your comment has interested me. I was under the impression that there was. Can you explain your view on bloom booster. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-29-2008, 08:47 PM
cb977's Avatar
cb977 cb977 is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Zone: 9a
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 17,222
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by rogerman View Post
I found an interesting article on the net. Comment on it and pick it to bits. We can never get enough information on helping our investments.
Have fun reading

I have no comment on the article but wanted to make a suggestion:

when any of us find some bit of info on the web and want to share it with the others, it is always best to copy and paste the link to the actual web page it came from, rather than just copying the info into a thread here. The person who wrote the article should get the credit they are due

Thank you
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-29-2008, 08:55 PM
rtsingleton rtsingleton is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Zone: 8b
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Posts: 158
Look what i found. Male
Default

I think Ray is saying that you should just give the plant all the macro and micro nutrients it needs all the time and the plant will bloom as long as it is happy. That is to say it isn't necessary to use a formula to boost a bloom but to just give the plant what it wants and needs and it will carry out its cycle to bloom.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-29-2008, 08:58 PM
cb977's Avatar
cb977 cb977 is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Zone: 9a
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 17,222
Default

All the knowledgeable growers I have discussed bloom booster with agree...orchids do not need bloom booster. Give them what they truly need all the time and they will do just fine
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-29-2008, 10:12 PM
rogerman rogerman is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Nonthaburi Thailand
Posts: 465
Look what i found. Male
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cb977 View Post
The person who wrote the article should get the credit they are due

Thank you
Sorry about that..... I have added the writers name Of course they should get the credit due.

A few years ago back in my home country, I entered a scientific show. My exhibit was headed "Too much spoils the growth" It showed that the over-usage of fertilizers actually slows down the growth.

I got first prize.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-30-2008, 10:17 AM
cb977's Avatar
cb977 cb977 is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Zone: 9a
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 17,222
Default

Quote:
Sorry about that..... I have added the writers name Of course they should get the credit due.
Thank you

and congrats on your
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-30-2008, 10:40 AM
BikerDoc5968 BikerDoc5968 is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Zone: 5b
Location: W. Bloomfield, Michigan
Posts: 3,086
Default

Not to be a "Johnny come lately", but it seems to me there was an "old" thread about this very subject and someone found an article written by, I believe, Dr. Yin-Tung Wang from Texas A&M. I thought I saved the link but must have been one of my more common senior moments...been having lot of those lately! Anyway, as Ray has said, it seems to be more a nitrogen issue and not so much a PO4/K issue with flowering.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
fertilizer, fertilizers, nutrients, orchid, water, found


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Finally found one...maybe! cb977 Miscellaneous & Other Genera 9 01-08-2020 02:34 PM
I found scale... but only one... now i'm confused let_it_grow Pests & Diseases 7 12-07-2008 08:42 AM
Eeek...I found a mealy bug! Becca Pests & Diseases 4 10-01-2008 01:25 PM
A new Haul of species found in vietnam Tindomul Scientific Matters 3 05-31-2008 09:54 AM
Thanks to my Dad - I found a way to do it Grandma M Vanda Alliance - others 13 04-06-2008 07:54 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:19 AM.

© 2007 OrchidBoard.com
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.37 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Clubs vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.