A Fertilizer Discussion Reprise
Login
User Name
Password   


Registration is FREE. Click to become a member of OrchidBoard community
(You're NOT logged in)

menu menu

Sponsor
Donate Now
and become
Forum Supporter.

A Fertilizer Discussion Reprise
Many perks!
<...more...>


Sponsor
 

Google


Fauna Top Sites
Register A Fertilizer Discussion Reprise Members A Fertilizer Discussion Reprise A Fertilizer Discussion Reprise Today's PostsA Fertilizer Discussion Reprise A Fertilizer Discussion Reprise A Fertilizer Discussion Reprise
LOG IN/REGISTER TO CLOSE THIS ADVERTISEMENT
Go Back   Orchid Board - Most Complete Orchid Forum on the web ! > >
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-02-2021, 07:43 AM
Ray's Avatar
Ray Ray is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: May 2005
Member of:AOS
Location: Oak Island NC
Posts: 14,818
A Fertilizer Discussion Reprise Male
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadeflower View Post
Why do we know that the msu has a ppm of 264?

Yep because someone decided to stick a ppm meter in the bucket and check... That's all it is.
Nope.

First, do you even know what Total Dissolved Solids is, and do you know how it is accurately determined? (Your earlier response says “no”.)

TDS is determined by evaporating 100% of the water from a known mass of clear solution (i.e., no suspended solids) and weighing the solids that were left behind.

In the case of MSURO, it takes 0.74 g of dry fertilizer powder to produce a liter of 100 ppm N solution. Assuming we used pure water, evaporating it would give us the 0.74g back, and that would mean that the true TDS of that solution is 740 ppm.

Since there are 3.785 liters in a gallon, that same amount of powder in a gallon would give 740/3.785=195 ppm TDS (and 26 ppm N), but since we were originally referring to a full gram in that gallon, that would increase the true TDS to 1000/3.785=264 ppm (and about 36 ppm N).

TDS meters DO NOT “measure” dissolved solids, they infer it from the electrical conductivity, and that’s where the problem is.

The EC of a solution relies on the travel of ions between electrodes. The magnitude of that is determined by the charge of the ion, its physical size, and the quantity in the solution. (For the purposes of this, I am ignoring the effect of temperature on the solution viscosity, but that also affects it.). The more charge that travels per unit time, the greater the conductivity.
  • Smaller ions travel through the solution faster than large ones, and that means they contribute to greater conductivity.
  • More highly charged ions carry more free electrons, so they have higher conductivity than less-highly charged ones.
  • The greater the concentration, the greater the number of free electrons in the solution, so the higher the EC.

TDS meters are cheap EC meters with a built-in conversion factor, but in the majority of the cases, that conversion is based upon a sodium chloride solution of known (weighed) concentration. That would be great if you only wanted to measure sodium chloride solutions, but fertilizers have entirely different chemistries, so they contain many kinds of ions of all sizes, charges and concentrations, so the EC versus dissolved solids content is different for every fertilizer formula, and does not fit the NaCl “standard”.

It is certainly possible to create a calibration curve so that you’d know the “corrected conversion factor”, but it would have to be done for literally every different solution you made up.
__________________
Ray Barkalow, Orchid Iconoclast
FIRSTRAYS.COM
Try Kelpak - you won't be sorry!
  #12  
Old 10-02-2021, 08:10 AM
Shadeflower Shadeflower is offline
Banned
 

Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,247
A Fertilizer Discussion Reprise
Default

Ray I cannot take anything you say too seriously I am afraid after you have been telling people to feed wrong for over a century.

Even to this day you have very conflicting information on your website and you are asking me if I have a clue?

Cmon, there's being friendly and there is just being an obnoxious *** about things.

What's your point? That you are great no matter what you say?

At least fix the wrong statements on your website if you no longer believe in them!

eg
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray
In order to achieve the commonly-recommended fertilizer solution concentration of 125 ppm N
Commonly recommended fertilizer solution?

Have you ever grown orchids Ray?

If I were to plug those numbers into your calculator and I would add that to my water with a theoretical concentration of 125 N of a 20-20-20 fertilizer my TDS would come out at over 750 ppm.

You said yourself you were telling people for 8 years to feed such a high dose and now you are trying to lecture me?

After failing to update your website and rectify bad information that you yourself admit have changed doing like 8 years ago already.

Please.
  #13  
Old 10-02-2021, 08:56 AM
isurus79's Avatar
isurus79 isurus79 is offline
Senior Member
American Orchid Society Judge
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Zone: 8b
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Age: 44
Posts: 10,165
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadeflower View Post
Ray I cannot take anything you say too seriously I am afraid after you have been telling people to feed wrong for over a century.

Even to this day you have very conflicting information on your website and you are asking me if I have a clue?

Cmon, there's being friendly and there is just being an obnoxious *** about things.

What's your point? That you are great no matter what you say?

At least fix the wrong statements on your website if you no longer believe in them!

eg

Commonly recommended fertilizer solution?

Have you ever grown orchids Ray?

If I were to plug those numbers into your calculator and I would add that to my water with a theoretical concentration of 125 N of a 20-20-20 fertilizer my TDS would come out at over 750 ppm.

You said yourself you were telling people for 8 years to feed such a high dose and now you are trying to lecture me?

After failing to update your website and rectify bad information that you yourself admit have changed doing like 8 years ago already.

Please.
Wow, you might want to reconsider who has been spewing wrong information on this site. You've got quite the hit list just this week alone...
__________________
Stephen Van Kampen-Lewis

Pics on Flickr

Instagram

YouTube
  #14  
Old 10-02-2021, 09:49 AM
Dusty Ol' Man's Avatar
Dusty Ol' Man Dusty Ol' Man is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Oct 2020
Zone: 10a
Location: Lake Charles, Louisiana
Age: 69
Posts: 1,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by isurus79 View Post
Wow, you might want to reconsider who has been spewing wrong information on this site. You've got quite the hit list just this week alone...
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
Likes isurus79 liked this post
  #15  
Old 10-02-2021, 12:39 PM
estación seca's Avatar
estación seca estación seca is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2015
Zone: 9b
Location: Phoenix AZ - Lower Sonoran Desert
Posts: 17,891
A Fertilizer Discussion Reprise Male
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wisdomseeker View Post
I'm confused about this, and don't fully understand.

There are several quality TDS bench meters (various brands) that are frequently used in the water/wastewater field that are fairly accurate with their test results.

Relationship Between TS, TSS and TDS

Solids, Total and Dissolved (TSS and TDS) - Water Quality Parameters | Hach
This is my point exactly. The only way to measure dissolved solids is to evaporate all the water, then weigh the residue. When people discuss a "TDS meter" they imagine a device similar to a pH meter that they stick in a glass of water, then read a number off a screen. There is no such TDS meter.

The "TDS meters" available on Amazon and shown above in other posts measure electrical conductivity, not dissolved solids. Electrical conductivity can't be converted to a TDS reading without knowing the exact composition of the minerals suspended in the water.
__________________
May the bridges I've burned light my way.

Weather forecast for my neighborhood
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes
Likes wisdomseeker, rbarata liked this post
  #16  
Old 10-02-2021, 02:48 PM
wisdomseeker wisdomseeker is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Feb 2018
Member of:Past member AOS
Location: SE USA
Posts: 383
A Fertilizer Discussion Reprise Male
Default

WW "SUPER MOD" - phone rang as I was typing post, and that call went on longer than wanted - came back and hit "submit reply" before you moved this thread. Can you move it to the correct location? Thanks.


ES - I figured that's where you were coming from, along with the point you were trying to convey. "There is no such thing as a ppm meter and there is no such thing as a TDS meter. It's physically impossible to make something like that for mixed chemicals dissolved in water. Have you ever taken a chemistry class"?

Maybe, without someone realizing how to measure TDS -and/or- without someone really knowing what TDS is all about, they might assume any device labeled as a EC or TDS meter is going to give true/accurate results: along with providing the answers of knowing the exact amount/composition of total dissolved solids.

Most of these meters are more-or-less considered to be an 'easy button' tool. Test results are going to vary greatly in mileage, per se. I "also agree" with other previous comments: that these devices can help to give someone a basic "idea/result" (especially if accuracy is not needed for their testing applications).

I inserted a couple links within my previous post, trying to be cordial, and hopefully without stepping on any toes. And just maybe, the links were able to provide some useful information (maybe, helping to eliminate any confusion). I think Ray had a good explanation in his last post (within this thread).

Last edited by wisdomseeker; 10-03-2021 at 01:16 AM..
  #17  
Old 10-02-2021, 03:14 PM
Roberta's Avatar
Roberta Roberta is offline
Super Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2008
Zone: 10a
Location: Coastal southern California, USA
Posts: 12,896
A Fertilizer Discussion Reprise Female
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wisdomseeker View Post
WW "SUPER MOD" - phone rang as I was typing post, and that call went on longer than wanted - came back and hit "submit reply" before you moved this thread. Can you move it to the correct location? Thanks.
Not WW, but got it done.
__________________
Orchids teach patience!

Roberta's Orchids (Visit my back yard)

See what orchid species are blooming in Southern California(New page for APRIL 2024)
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes
Likes wisdomseeker, WaterWitchin liked this post
  #18  
Old 10-02-2021, 03:35 PM
wisdomseeker wisdomseeker is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Feb 2018
Member of:Past member AOS
Location: SE USA
Posts: 383
A Fertilizer Discussion Reprise Male
Default

Thanks Roberta. That was quick! I now see where the word 'super' comes in to play
  #19  
Old 10-02-2021, 04:01 PM
Roberta's Avatar
Roberta Roberta is offline
Super Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2008
Zone: 10a
Location: Coastal southern California, USA
Posts: 12,896
A Fertilizer Discussion Reprise Female
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wisdomseeker View Post
Thanks Roberta. That was quick! I now see where the word 'super' comes in to play
The three of us, in different time zones, have the world pretty well covered.

Where I find my "TDS" meter useful is not so much for absolute readings (which don't say much) but rather for changes. For instance, I know when my RO membrane is pooping out both by the slowing of its production, and also an increase in TDS. Do I care whether the "true" TDS is 5 or 10 or even 15 ppm? Not particularly. But when it hits 30, a pretty good indication that I need to change it out. So the differences that I read are comparing apples and apples. Likewise, when I check on my tap water, if it reads 180, it doesn't much matter whether the true value is 150 or 200. When it reads 400, it is a "bad water" day, the chemical composition of the water is going to be pretty much the same, there's just more calcium because the water company was changing sources. (But I know it isn't sodium causing the rise because that isn't what is in the water based on historical analyses and knowing something of the sources)
__________________
Orchids teach patience!

Roberta's Orchids (Visit my back yard)

See what orchid species are blooming in Southern California(New page for APRIL 2024)
  #20  
Old 10-03-2021, 07:39 AM
Ray's Avatar
Ray Ray is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: May 2005
Member of:AOS
Location: Oak Island NC
Posts: 14,818
A Fertilizer Discussion Reprise Male
Default

Shadeflower should have been a politician - neither facts nor context matter.
__________________
Ray Barkalow, Orchid Iconoclast
FIRSTRAYS.COM
Try Kelpak - you won't be sorry!
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes
Likes estación seca, Dusty Ol' Man liked this post
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question about fertilizer mixer and fertilizer schedule. BrassavolaStars Beginner Discussion 1 08-26-2019 04:55 PM
Fertilizer Measuring TDS EC Osmolality Osmolarity Water Quality estación seca Beginner Discussion 2 08-20-2017 08:30 AM
Amazing New Fertilizer ronaldhanko Scientific Matters 120 06-12-2015 01:20 PM
What the MSU fertilizer looks like? newflasker Advanced Discussion 27 08-04-2012 05:06 AM
Thoughts on fertilizer. Team Ferret Beginner Discussion 34 07-28-2008 08:47 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:02 PM.

© 2007 OrchidBoard.com
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.37 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Clubs vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.