Donate Now
and become
Forum Supporter.
Many perks! <...more...>

|

12-02-2013, 02:00 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 553
|
|
VERY nice images, indeed. If you do lots of insects, consider the Canon MPE 65 mm. Most insects are small (Cocinnella/Adalia septempunctata), so even 1:1 still leaves them small. With the MPE 65 you can get to 5:1, with a 1.4x TC to 7:1, with 2x TC to 10:1. With that lens, though, flash is almost a pre-requisite; I use the MX24 twin macro mostly.
@Tucker: re sharpness handheld, if you remember longest time hand-held = 1/focal length, (so for 90 mm [35 mm/full frame equivalent] = 1/100 or 1/125), then you can get sharp images with proper body support, breathing technique, and slowly depressing shutter. Tripod still helps.
85 mm MicroNikkor? I thought Nikon has 55 and 105 Micros.
I was just looking myself into adding to the macro lenses, and Tamron and Canon are pretty darn close [still can't beat Zeiss]. Had some CC reward points and traded them in for a Canon 180 mm macro :-) Free lens!
Re focus, I have never used AF for macro. Just turn it off permanently, and it will be easier than having to fight AF. If you can, get a matt focusing screen for your body. Using the LCD screen with LiveView (if you have it) is another option. I like it quite a bit, but it only permits placing focal plane. With DOF preview button pressed, often there is too little light coming through.
Interesting, that you are looking into ND grads, rather than doing HDR. I have the Lee sets, and rather use the hard edge than the soft edge. I mainly use them on 4x5" as those chromes do not permit RAW processing ;-) I have used them also for video on my 5D mkii.
Keep up the good work, those are gorgeous! I'll have to wait till about Feb/March for the mushrooms to come out in SoCal.
|
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
|
|
|

12-02-2013, 06:47 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: middle of the Netherlands
Posts: 13,782
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tropterrarium
VERY nice images, indeed. If you do lots of insects, consider the Canon MPE 65 mm. Most insects are small (Cocinnella/Adalia septempunctata), so even 1:1 still leaves them small. With the MPE 65 you can get to 5:1, with a 1.4x TC to 7:1, with 2x TC to 10:1. With that lens, though, flash is almost a pre-requisite; I use the MX24 twin macro mostly.
@Tucker: re sharpness handheld, if you remember longest time hand-held = 1/focal length, (so for 90 mm [35 mm/full frame equivalent] = 1/100 or 1/125), then you can get sharp images with proper body support, breathing technique, and slowly depressing shutter. Tripod still helps.
85 mm MicroNikkor? I thought Nikon has 55 and 105 Micros.
I was just looking myself into adding to the macro lenses, and Tamron and Canon are pretty darn close [still can't beat Zeiss]. Had some CC reward points and traded them in for a Canon 180 mm macro :-) Free lens!
Re focus, I have never used AF for macro. Just turn it off permanently, and it will be easier than having to fight AF. If you can, get a matt focusing screen for your body. Using the LCD screen with LiveView (if you have it) is another option. I like it quite a bit, but it only permits placing focal plane. With DOF preview button pressed, often there is too little light coming through.
Interesting, that you are looking into ND grads, rather than doing HDR. I have the Lee sets, and rather use the hard edge than the soft edge. I mainly use them on 4x5" as those chromes do not permit RAW processing ;-) I have used them also for video on my 5D mkii.
Keep up the good work, those are gorgeous! I'll have to wait till about Feb/March for the mushrooms to come out in SoCal.
|
Though I say I shoot handheld, it's with all the tricks you mention! I've learned how to use my body as a 'tripod', and press the shutter very slowly while holding my breath... And I try to make use of what's around me, like trees or rocks or even the ground, or my bicycle. I think doing it this way, in combiniation with using a prime lens, makes me think a whole lot more about composition than if I had a tripod that I could easily move around and adjust.
Now as to the filters... I'm not a big fan of heavy post processing, my goal is to learn how to do as much as possible in camera. It also feels more rewarding to me to do it that way. I'm a bit old school I guess. That and also because I have yet to find a good freeware/ low cost HDR software.
A colleague has the Canon MP-E 65mm, and wow is it amazing! The tricky bit is getting the insect models to sit still... Aside from her job as a post-doc, she and 2 other people in our group have a photo business specializing in insect macro photography (since we all work in entomology)
And I've never heard of focusing screens, will have to look it up! Though with the Liveview it's possible to focus quite precisely with the 10x magnification.
__________________
Camille
Completely orchid obsessed and loving every minute of it....
My Orchid Photos
|
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:49 PM.
|