Login
User Name
Password   


Registration is FREE. Click to become a member of OrchidBoard community
(You're NOT logged in)

menu menu
Sponsor
Donate Now
and become
Forum Supporter.


Many perks!
<...more...>




Sponsor

 

Google


  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-18-2009, 08:15 PM
Jr. Member
 

Join Date: Oct 2009
Zone: 11
Location: Naples, Fl.
Posts: 2
Male
Default Help with ID for "JEM 536" CTSM

Hi everyone, my tag for my Ctsm has fallen to many pieces and most are missing! It is a "JEM 536" Ctsm.,, It has "scewiczii X expansum" in it, and that is all I know. Please help,, Thanks, Steve
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
Remove advertisements
Advertisement Sponsored links

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-18-2009, 09:12 PM
cb977's Avatar
Ambassador
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Zone: 9a
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 15,882
Default

Hi Steve

It seems the info on your tag is missing a few details

Here's what I found in Orchidwiz:
Quote:
Clowesetum Manny Tavarez (Catasetum expansum x Clowesia warczewitzii)
It was originated by JEM in 2009...hope this helps

We'd love to hear more from you...check out our Introductions - Break The Ice forum
Introductions - Break the Ice ! - Orchid Board - Most Complete Orchid Forum on the web !
__________________
Susanne

New to forums?
http://www.orchidboard.com/community...u-started.html

Posting Photos?
http://www.orchidboard.com/community...chidboard.html

Enjoy the board...and remember
Leave your ego at the door

It's better to let someone think you are a fool than to open your mouth and prove it
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-18-2009, 10:18 PM
Jr. Member
 

Join Date: Oct 2009
Zone: 11
Location: Naples, Fl.
Posts: 2
Male
Default

The botom part of the tag has "jem 536 03/18/2004,, and it has the "warczewitzii" X "expansum". Does not make differance which plant is the parent?

Steve
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-18-2009, 11:09 PM
cb977's Avatar
Ambassador
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Zone: 9a
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 15,882
Default

The jem 536 3/18/2004 seems to be a code that the grower used. It is not part of the plant's name.

I'm sure somebody will correct me if I'm wrong (and I hope they do! ) but I don't think the name of the plant changes when the parents are switched around...I think the hybrid would show more traits from the first parent
__________________
Susanne

New to forums?
http://www.orchidboard.com/community...u-started.html

Posting Photos?
http://www.orchidboard.com/community...chidboard.html

Enjoy the board...and remember
Leave your ego at the door

It's better to let someone think you are a fool than to open your mouth and prove it
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-18-2009, 11:44 PM
gixrj18's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2007
Zone: 9b
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,425
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cb977 View Post
The jem 536 3/18/2004 seems to be a code that the grower used. It is not part of the plant's name.

I'm sure somebody will correct me if I'm wrong (and I hope they do! ) but I don't think the name of the plant changes when the parents are switched around...I think the hybrid would show more traits from the first parent
Sue is correct....the name is the same either way it is crossed. If the Jem 536 was in apostrophes like this: 'Jem 536'.... then this means the plant was awarded, and the grower chose this as the cultivar name.
__________________
: Jasen
------ON THE NEVER-ENDING JOURNEY TO CURE THE 'EPIPHYTIC ITCH'--------
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-18-2009, 11:51 PM
gixrj18's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2007
Zone: 9b
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,425
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shallfly View Post
The botom part of the tag has "jem 536 03/18/2004,, and it has the "warczewitzii" X "expansum". Does not make differance which plant is the parent?

Steve
This is both the parents. It is telling you that this is a cross between Ctsm. warczewitzii and Ctsm. expansum, which would be written like Ctsm. (warczewitzii x expansum). Then, several years later (when the plant bloomed), the cultivar registered the cross with the RHS, and gave this hybrid the name that Susanne provided. Now that it is registered in that name, anyone who ever makes that cross again, will have to call it by that name.
__________________
: Jasen
------ON THE NEVER-ENDING JOURNEY TO CURE THE 'EPIPHYTIC ITCH'--------
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links Remove advertisements
Advertisement

Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Catasetum macrocarpum gixrj18 Catasetum and Stanhopea Alliance 16 09-08-2009 09:59 PM
Ctsm. imperiale, Thinger Dinger x expansum Sandy4453 Catasetum and Stanhopea Alliance 4 07-21-2009 06:36 AM
Ctsm. tenebrosum Hawaiian Sunshine Catasetum and Stanhopea Alliance 5 07-11-2009 09:50 AM
Ctsm Crownfox Voodoo 'SVO' AM/AOS x Ctsm Donna Wise 'Kathleen' AM/AOS dvespertilio Catasetum and Stanhopea Alliance 3 03-11-2009 05:24 PM
Ctsm. (fuchsii x expansum) photo and question nancy Catasetum and Stanhopea Alliance 4 09-12-2008 11:13 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:06 AM.

© 2007 OrchidBoard.com

Vivarium TopSites Top Orchid Sites
Ad Management by RedTyger

SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63