Supplemental light: PPFD vs Foot Candles
Login
User Name
Password   


Registration is FREE. Click to become a member of OrchidBoard community
(You're NOT logged in)

menu menu

Sponsor
Donate Now
and become
Forum Supporter.

Supplemental light: PPFD vs Foot Candles
Many perks!
<...more...>


Sponsor
 

Google


Fauna Top Sites
LOG IN/REGISTER TO CLOSE THIS ADVERTISEMENT
  #21  
Old 07-10-2023, 02:06 PM
Ray's Avatar
Ray Ray is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: May 2005
Member of:AOS
Location: Oak Island NC
Posts: 15,065
Supplemental light: PPFD vs Foot Candles Male
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockyfarm View Post
Thanks for your reply. With regard to the PAR meter; the output number might look the same for a source heavy with green light as for one uniformly distributed from blue through red, or even with red and blue peaks. Would our plants really benefit the same from each of these three?
No, they would not, as plants can react differently under different spectra. That's why having a PAR meter and spectrophotometer would be a valuable set of tools.

Quote:
Your comment regarding chemical processing sounds very reasonable; one might think the longer daylength at lower light levels would give more time for efficient nutrient processing and metabolizing. Too bad we can't ask the plants for their preferences.
I don't think that would be clear thinking.

In equatorial regions days and night are roughly the same length of time and that shifts a bit seasonally as you more farther north or south. I would think that plants have adapted to those conditions of intensity and schedule, so I question whether trying to move them out of that "helps".

I honestly believe there are a lot more variables than we, the hobby growers, really understand, so we do what we can to "get by".

Even feeding is like that. All of the money put into plant nutrition research and it still comes down to "this worked, while that didn't", without a great deal of solid "and that's why" to back it up.
__________________
Ray Barkalow, Orchid Iconoclast
FIRSTRAYS.COM
Try Kelpak - you won't be sorry!

Last edited by Ray; 07-10-2023 at 02:08 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-10-2023, 03:06 PM
rockyfarm rockyfarm is offline
Member
 

Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Maine and North Carolina
Posts: 47
Supplemental light: PPFD vs Foot Candles Male
Default

Ray, I agree that the original species are adapted to the conditions they were collected from. I'm growing mostly hybrids (that might not even survive in their source sites), and I'm growing them in a locale where NO epiphytic orchids live, and it's in a basement, about as artificial as you can get. So I have to provide every component for their survival. Since my lights are 'on' or 'off' I have to pick a 'daylength', and that need not be at 12 and 12. In my working days I could measure oxygen production as an indicator of photosynthesis, and investigate productivity at various durations, spectra, and intensities. But I don't have that equipment here, and I want more than just maximizing growth rate of my orchids - they should bloom, recover, and resume growth. So, although it is a hobby (for me, anyway), I like to learn how to improve my cultivation. Thanks for your response.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-10-2023, 04:12 PM
Ray's Avatar
Ray Ray is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: May 2005
Member of:AOS
Location: Oak Island NC
Posts: 15,065
Supplemental light: PPFD vs Foot Candles Male
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockyfarm View Post
Ray, I agree that the original species are adapted to the conditions they were collected from. I'm growing mostly hybrids (that might not even survive in their source sites), and I'm growing them in a locale where NO epiphytic orchids live, and it's in a basement, about as artificial as you can get. So I have to provide every component for their survival. Since my lights are 'on' or 'off' I have to pick a 'daylength', and that need not be at 12 and 12. In my working days I could measure oxygen production as an indicator of photosynthesis, and investigate productivity at various durations, spectra, and intensities. But I don't have that equipment here, and I want more than just maximizing growth rate of my orchids - they should bloom, recover, and resume growth. So, although it is a hobby (for me, anyway), I like to learn how to improve my cultivation. Thanks for your response.
Rocky, I am not disagreeing with your approach. I was merely trying to convey that while there is bound to be some adaptability, there are limits.
__________________
Ray Barkalow, Orchid Iconoclast
FIRSTRAYS.COM
Try Kelpak - you won't be sorry!
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-10-2023, 04:17 PM
Clawhammer Clawhammer is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,297
Supplemental light: PPFD vs Foot Candles
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockyfarm View Post
I like the idea of integrating the PPFD value(s) over time (DLI) so I can manage daylength, under lights for optimum plant 'satisfaction'. I'm interested in cutting back the light intensities a bit to reduce their heating effect on my grow rooms.
I also grow in a basement. I do four things to reduce heat and ultimately my electric bill:

1) During hot summer days (95+) I turn off half of my lights, the next day I turn them back on and turn off the other half. My plants normally all get the high end of the light range and I think they appreciate the shady days. This can also be a strategy if your lighting is too intense and you need to spread out the light energy.

2.) I open up a basement window and door around 3am in order to help cool my basement before the lights come on. I use a fan in front of the door to drop my basement temp as much as possible. A couple hours of this seems to have a lasting effect throughout the day. It also seems to help keep the rest of my house cooler on hot days.

3.) I change the light schedule to have them come on in the very early morning so that they shut off before the hottest part of the day.

4.) Since my grow room is all concrete, including the floor, on hot days I lightly spray the whole room with water, duplicating a short rain shower. Not enough to wet the media, just the leaves, trays, and floor. The evaporation drops the temp 1-2 degrees, and slows down temp increases for at least 3 hours after the drop.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-10-2023, 04:34 PM
camille1585's Avatar
camille1585 camille1585 is offline
Administrator
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: middle of the Netherlands
Posts: 13,766
Default

Photoperiod can be extended with lower PAR levels for a lot of plants, but it has to be determined on a case by case basis. At my work (indoor farming) we know of some plant species which can have daylengths extended to 22h with limited side effects, and others are very unhappy if you push the boundries too much. Nighttime is important for plants as this is the period where a lot of important processes are carries out. As said above in earlier posts, there are chemical processes involved. For instance, one crop I've researched heavily can only photosynthize so much per day. Sugars accumulate in the leaf faster than they can be transported out and this transport happens mainly at night. If sugars aren't moved out they build up in the leaf and get converted to starch granules. These then crowd out the chloroplasts in the cells and give the leaves a chlorotic, blotchy yellow color.




Quote:
Originally Posted by rockyfarm View Post
Thanks for your reply. With regard to the PAR meter; the output number might look the same for a source heavy with green light as for one uniformly distributed from blue through red, or even with red and blue peaks. Would our plants really benefit the same from each of these three?

Your comment regarding chemical processing sounds very reasonable; one might think the longer daylength at lower light levels would give more time for efficient nutrient processing and metabolizing. Too bad we can't ask the plants for their preferences.
For your first statement that would be technically correct, a spectrum heavy in green would have similar PAR to one with strong red/blue peaks. However, how relevant is that comparision? You are never going to find any 'daylight' spectrum bulbs or grow lights which are green heavy.
__________________
Camille

Completely orchid obsessed and loving every minute of it....

My Orchid Photos
Reply With Quote
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
Likes Clawhammer liked this post
  #26  
Old 07-10-2023, 05:16 PM
rockyfarm rockyfarm is offline
Member
 

Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Maine and North Carolina
Posts: 47
Supplemental light: PPFD vs Foot Candles Male
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clawhammer View Post
I also grow in a basement. I do four things to reduce heat and ultimately my electric bill:

2.) I open up a basement window and door around 3am in order to help cool my basement before the lights come on. I use a fan in front of the door to drop my basement temp as much as possible. A couple hours of this seems to have a lasting effect throughout the day. It also seems to help keep the rest of my house cooler on hot days.

4.) Since my grow room is all concrete, including the floor, on hot days I lightly spray the whole room with water, duplicating a short rain shower. Not enough to wet the media, just the leaves, trays, and floor. The evaporation drops the temp 1-2 degrees, and slows down temp increases for at least 3 hours after the drop.
Sounds challenging. I am lucky to be growing in a basement up north; mid-July it is still 65F (below grade). I've built a grow-room within this basement, fully lined with poly and with foam panel insulation on the ceiling and walls down to 4' above ground. The lamps warm the top part of grow-room to the upper 70's at which time a fan on the floor starts mixing in the cool air residing below the benches. I don't (so far) have to bring in outdoor air, and humidity runs 60 to 75% even without my mister running. In North Carolina I grow upstairs and it does get hot; I bought an evaporative cooler and place it on a drainage tray on a window sill (Amazon.com). This knocks over 5 degrees off the room temperature while keeping up humidity. I was surprised how well it worked even in a fairly humid southeastern locale.
Reply With Quote
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
Likes blurrycollie liked this post
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
candles, foot, light, orchids, ppfd


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LED vs CFL, 10W IKEA VÄXER, T5, PPFD, DLI, & general grow light information Max - LEDTonic Growing Under Lights 2 09-29-2019 01:31 PM
Do I need supplemental lighting for my phalaenopsis orchids?! Orchid grower Beginner Discussion 17 03-08-2019 09:15 AM
What is this on my new shoot?? Helen Cattleya Alliance 19 09-20-2012 06:35 PM
how to determine foot candles with digital camera? armagedon48 Beginner Discussion 10 02-10-2009 11:50 PM
Fine I'll say Hi Vim Introductions - Break the Ice ! 13 04-02-2006 12:30 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:26 PM.

© 2007 OrchidBoard.com
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.37 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Clubs vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.