Something interesting among Catasetinae, is that phenotype can be deceitful.... Catasetum have a lot of new evolutionary traits at the "same time", so for that reason genes that control other group of loci expression hasn't had enough evolutionary time to show good control over phenotype expression...
And what in the hell that means?????
what I mean is that if you cross lets say Guarianthe skinneri x Guarianthe aurantiaca, all the offspring is going to be on the geometrical median between species and only posterior selfins, siblings or back crossings are going to show considerable regression to one of the parents. But with Catasetum on first generation hybrids the geometrical median can have much broader spectrum, even part of the offspring couldn't be separated from one of the parent phenotype, something that even show in catasetinae intergeneric hybrids... Them, even if lets say a macrocarpum almost alike tapiriceps could have much more macrocarpum genes on it as expected, their still is a considerable chance that even this almost macrocarpum could be the result of 50/50 % of contribution even if phenotype tells the contrary
The thing could be even more interesting, I personally had seen tapiriceps that change labelum phenotype from one year to the other... On this matter we could "blame" many things like between years environmental changes and/or cultural ones, but the thing is that this reflect poor control on gene expression difficult to see (at least at this scale), even in the more complex Cattleya hybrids.
Jan
P.D. Bruno,is you are reading me, please see the plate 302804.jpg... it look very much to your "saccatum" hybrid I call "dunsterville"
Last edited by Jan Pahl; 10-27-2009 at 04:39 PM..
|