![]() |
Btw, if you guys want to properly denote a natural hybrid it would look like the following:
Phalaenopsis x leucorrhoda Phalaenopsis x gernotii |
Quote:
Off the top of my head I know some other hybrids that could easily be thought to be a species if there's no capital. Phal Wiganiae Paph Delrosi |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Ok, well then Paph Maudiae is a good example of what I'm talking about. It's just that it doesn't have a hybrid counterpart and a species counterpart with the same name then; it's just a complex man-made hybrid with a Latinized name.
But there are definitely other man-made hybrids that have Latinized names as was mentioned by Camille. |
Philip, thank you for explaining this in a manner that doesn't make my head spin.
Camille, thank you for your contribution. I learn so much everyday from all of you who are a wealth of knowledge. Thanks for taking the time to educate us. Kudos!!! |
"....The Molly creature have been known to have attacked me or have been harassing me in several occations on reasons beyond my comprehension. So if I see them I am al..."
Excuse me!! You made the statement that is flat wrong. I just asked you a simple question. Your aggressiveness following outlandish posts is amusing. |
Quote:
http://www.orchidboard.com/community...ry-hybrid.html |
Quote:
there are also cases where reclassification of species has given 2 different hybrids the same name. For example, Cattleya Sedenii (Registered as LC Sedenii in 1877), and the other Cattleya Sedenii (registered 1896) latinized names are common for hybrids created during the victorian era, but more modern hybrids are made using English names in order to avoid these types of confusion. |
Quote:
You know more about the Paph Maudiae thing... What you said. :) |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:21 PM. |
3.8.9
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.37 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.