
09-24-2008, 03:40 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Zone: 7b
Location: Smyrna, Georgia
Age: 56
Posts: 1,203
|
|
As BikerDoc explained, the school of thought behind cutting the stem off is that spike and flower growth take a lot of energy. A flower spike is essentially a specialized leaf growth. The more energy used by the plant in blooming, the less available for leaf and root growth. Thus, they say that the natural flowering is a good thing, but encouraging a second blooming is stressful to the plant.
The other school argues that if the plant is healthy and vigorous, and it is capable of a secondary blooming, then why not? Some books and growers actually encourage the practice. Typically, you cut the stem about a half an inch above the last growth node on the stem BEFORE where the first flower appears, and it awakens the dormant growth eye at this node, creating a new spike.
I am not personally going to advocate either practice in general. I've grown both ways in the past. However, in the case of your plant I think I'd side with those who say you should cut the spike off. The plant was rescued, and while it looks healthy right now stress can take a while to actually show on a Phal. I would err on the side of caution, and presume that the plant is stressed, and so in need of rest and focus. A healthy plant will grow a new spike and fine new blooms, but a stressed plant probably won't (if it does the flowering won't be nearly as good and the flowers may actually be misformed).
If you cut the stem off, cut it down at the base - and here, too, you'll hear arguments of how close to the plant to cut, but my own preference is about a half an inch from the plant. Dust the cut site with cinnamon, which will keep fungi from possibly invading the plant.
|